|
|
 |
|
|
 |
| Author |
Messages |
jb92563
Unregistered
|
Posted Monday, January 11, 2010 @ 12:07 PM
I have been trying to pull a bit of G by doing some uplines and downlines on a 30 degree angle lines.
I pulled 0.5 G's acording to the G meter. ( OK you can stop chuckling now, I like approaching flying stuff cautiously and gradually)
I have found that the Aerocarb tends to go rich or lean on + and - G's respectively.
Does the Zenith rx28 carb do that as well?
Seems like just another reason to put the original RX28 back on and drill the jet out as others have done.
--------------------
|
Collin
Unregistered
|
Posted Monday, January 11, 2010 @ 01:14 PM
Hi Ray.
I would reinstall the Zenith carb. I would start with using the std size main jet. I am using a std main on my 1,400 cc engine full throttle climb I see 1,400F (760C) exhaust temps. If pull the thottle back 1/8" (3mm) the exhaust temps drops 100F (100C). If you need a float bowl gasket I can send one.
Collin
|
jb92563
Unregistered
|
Posted Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:12 PM
Hi Collin,
I took the RX28 carb apart last night to see how it looks.
Its amazingly simple.
Its clean inside but someone did a poor gasket cutting job and misaligned the holes for the idle & air bleed joining them in to the main float chamber.
I could sure use a new gasket, or a patern for a proper one.
Can I buy one from you?
My mailing address is:
Ray Buhr
32941 Ethlene Drive
Lake Elsinore, CA
92530
[Edit by jb92563 on Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 12:13 PM]
--------------------
|
Bob Grimstead
Unregistered
|
Posted Tuesday, January 12, 2010 @ 09:32 PM
Hi Guys,
It is interesting that Collin says he is using a 'standard' size main jet on a 1400cc motor.
Between us, Matthew and I have four carburetors (one ofr each airplane and one spare).
We measured the actual diameters of the holes in what are supposed to bestandard 1.25mm jets and found a very wide variation, from an actual diameter of 1.25mm up to 1.32 mm.
We measured the diameters by buying a set of drill bits, 1.25mm, 1.26mm, 1.27mm and so on, up to 1.45mm.
By timing the aircraft's climbs and looking at the spark plugs, it seems that an actual jet hole diameter of 1.28mm or 1.29mm works best with a 1400cc motor. However, because I left my main jet in England I have had to make up one from a steel bolt. The only bolts I could get in Australia in that diameter and thread pitch were very hard, and I broke a number of bits drilling the holes, so I am currently flying HDO with a 1.32 jet. It seems to perform fairly well, but is does burn significantly more fuel than before.
Because of all this 'guesswork' I intend to buy an NGK AFX oxygen sensor, fit it to one of my exhaust pipes and ensure that the mixture is perfect with a 1.28 or 1.29 jet.
Unfortunately, having read the pdf manual, I have discovered that the 12-volt sensor actually measures voltage, and it has a heater incorporated, so presumably it will need a bigger battery to nesure a steady voltage for flight trials.
Is there anybody out there who has used an NGK AFX mixture sensor and can give me some advice?
Yours, Bob
|
jb92563
Unregistered
|
Posted Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 12:26 PM
I was reading all the forum stuff I could find about preparing the RX28 for the larger 1400cc displacement and it seems to me that Bob G
suggested opening the float valve jet to 2.5mm?
It sounds like that just ensures sufficient fuel flow rate capability to the bowl, but the 1.25mm jet is the one that actually controls how much fuel is metered into the engine ?
Are people saying that the 1.25mm needs to be opened slightly or at least confirmed that it is really 1.25mm exactly or slightly bigger.
I'll start with the standard jet (measure it to confirm size) and see what the performance is like before modifying it.
Bob, you could take your bolt and heat it with a torch till cherry red and slowly cool in the kitchen oven to remove some hardness.
http://www.threeplanes.net/toolsteel.html
--------------------
|
Collin
Unregistered
|
Posted Wednesday, January 13, 2010 @ 12:54 PM
Hi Ray,
I will send a gasket tomorrow.
Collin
|
jb92563
Unregistered
|
Posted Monday, September 27, 2010 @ 01:14 PM
This time of year its quite hot in Southern California and nearly 1 full year after I brought N-1771 home.
Now its become apparent what the issue was with the Aerocarb.
On Saturday I was all set to go visit the Flabob flyin and much to my dismay the engine seemed to be "missing" and ran somewhat erratically.
It was about 95F and I seemed to be experiencing fuel vapor bubbles in the fuel line due to the heat.
To confirm it was not plug fouling or something else I pulled all the plugs and they looked good, not fouled at all.
I adjusted the valves to spec since the cowl was off, gaped the plugs , and also checked the fuel filter which was clean.
Seems that the longer I ground ran the engine the worse it would get even cutting out above 1/2 throttle.
My Fuel lines already have insulated fire proofed covers about 1/2 thick.
The fuel lines had no leaks anywhere but the under cowl temps were high due to heating under the sun, ambient air temperature and the engine heat on the ground.
I am convinced it is simply fuel vaporizing in the lines.
The only other option if I wanted to keep the Aerocarb is to put a fuel pump in place, with a surplus return line and restrictor, back to the tank. However that will not eliminate the bubbles just reduce their duration of impact and delay formation a bit due to the extra pressure
created by the pump/return line.
Needless to say I did not fly, although the problem likely would have disappeared after getting in the air with a good airflow through the cowl to remove the extra heat.
I have given it some thought and figured that with a bowl type carb any bubbles that form can escape once they reach the bowl rather than being ingested into the engine as with the Aerocarb and is the way to ensure reliable fuel flow to the engine under the hot conditions.
I have the original Zenith carb and will install that back in the plane.
So for those considering a bowl less, non pressurized fuel system, this is definitely something to consider.
It has not been a problem with temps below 90F and if I don't ground run for too long so those in the cooler climates would probably be fine with it.
I imagine if Bob G's Zenith carb will work in the Australian heat, it should work as well for me in Southern California as well.
I just wish I could keep the Mixture adjustment capability and will investigate how one Zenith was modified to make that possible.
Looks like I am discovering what many including Rene' already knew but since my plane came with the Aerocarb installed I had to
try it out until reaching a limit of the design for my own environment, and wanted to share that here to save others some time and money in the future if they are considering the Aerocarb route.
--------------------
|
dannparks
Unregistered
|
Posted Monday, September 27, 2010 @ 03:36 PM
I could certainly be wrong, but I would be really surprised if you were getting vapor lock. It usually takes a lot of heat to create bubbles in the lines -- like in a fuel injection spider sitting on top of a hot engine after shutdown, or sitting in a heat-soaked engine-driven fuel pump (as it does in my RV6A). Your fuel system and aerocarb are fairly isolated from the hot metal parts.
I would try disconnecting the fuel line from the aerocarb and letting it drain out for a while and see if there isn't something else restricting fuel flow. If it is hot again, you might be able to see bubbles and confirm your theory.
A very important bit of information to know. I'm just a bit skeptical, that's all.
--------------------
|
dannparks
Unregistered
|
Posted Monday, September 27, 2010 @ 04:05 PM
A big question I forgot to ask first -- are you using auto fuel or Avgas?
[Edit by dannparks on Monday, September 27, 2010 @ 04:05 PM]
--------------------
|
Bob Grimstead
Unregistered
|
Posted Tuesday, September 28, 2010 @ 12:17 PM
Hi Guys,
I think I already said that vapour-locking and other fuel flow interruptions are precisely the main problems with these bowl-less carbs.
Fuel line insulation only slows down the flow of heat into the fuel line; it does not stop it.
Worse, once the fuel and line are hot, that insulation also slows down its cooling.
And all this is ten times worse with mogas than avgas, for various reasons.
Somewhere else on this site you will see that I have flown several hours with a digital thermometer under the lower cowling, clipped to the air filter.
From memory, the inlet air temperature is generally 25-30 degrees C (50-60 degrees F) hotter than ambient, so that on a hot day it is VERY hot under those cowlings. This is good for preventing carb ice, but bad for performance, and very bad for vapour-locking.
If you fit a Zenith 28RXZ carb to a 1400 engine you will definitely need to open out that main jet to 1.28mm or 1.30mm or maybe even more, unless you always fly from a high-altitude airfield.
Several 1400 Fournier owners have bragged to me that they get 'much better fuel consumption' with their bigger-than-standard engine.
They have obviously not stopped to think why.
This is clearly because they are running with a lean/weak mixture because they have not openend out their main jet (or possibly their needle valve -- or both).
This is great for a few hours.
They will save quite a lot of money on fuel.
Although they will be a little down on posible performance.
Unfortunately after a couple of hundred hours they will need new cylinder heads.
Or, worse, they will loose the welded head off an exhaust valve due to overheating and have to make a forced-landing, with all the repairs, expense and risk that involves.
Sensible people think about what they are doing.
Silly people don't.
The information is all on this site.
All you have to do is find it, read it, and then do it.
Yours, Bob
|
jb92563
Unregistered
|
Posted Tuesday, September 28, 2010 @ 04:44 PM
I'm using 91 Auto unleaded fuel.
Being in California I'll bet there plenty of alcohol in the fuel as well.
I'll drain the fuel line and see if anything suspect comes out.
I hope my fuel lines are compatible with the alcohol in the auto gas.
That could also be a problem as I seem to recall that its distinctly possible fuel lines
for AV gas may not be alcohol resistant.
My observations of the "missing" increased after longer ground running.
I ran for a minute or two at full throttle at the tie down and it was after this that the engine got nice and hot
that the missing really started getting bad. The Oil temp was up to 90C and the CHT had gotten up to 215C
If its not bubbles then there must be crud in the fuel line.
--------------------
|
Jorgen
Unregistered
|
Posted Tuesday, September 28, 2010 @ 05:24 PM
Ray,
vapour lock sounds plausible and I hate to play the devils advocate, but could your recent tank fix have something to do with your problem? Maybe you should do an "extended time exposure test" with the sealant in californian MOGAS.
If the problem doesn´t go away, dismantling the carb and wash/blow everything clean can be a cure and most often the culprit is never found. Keep us posted, I have a feeling that we will all be flying with progressively increasing alkohol content, so this might be a Fournier problem with increasing incidence.
May the 4's be with you/ Jörgen
|
dannparks
Unregistered
|
Posted Thursday, September 30, 2010 @ 02:19 AM
Ray, do you still have the fuel pump and all the related plumbing on N1771? If so, did you try to run it during the fuel problem?
--------------------
|
jb92563
Unregistered
|
Posted Friday, October 1, 2010 @ 11:58 AM
I think the alcohol content is suspect because I believe it lowers the vapor pressure of the fuel and allows bubbles to form sooner.
It also deteriorates some kinds of fuel hoses causing particles to flow downstream into the carb.
I also tried the fuel pump and it aleviated the problem intially for a few seconds but then returned because my fuel pump is installed improperly and forms a short loop.
The return fuel line at the carb loops back to the gascolator instead of properly being returned back to the tank, so forming a loop about 24"
long and is nearly useless in that configuration as it simply recirculates the warm fuel and bubbles around in the hottest area under the cowl.
What I will do is tear down the fuel system under the cowl and inspect the hoses and clean out the carb to see if there were any issues with deteriorating fuels lines or other particles in the carb. I will also pressure test to see if there are any leaks.
I don't experience any problems when its cooler or I don't taxi long, but on that day, since I had just repaired the tank, I ground ran the engine for a good 5- 10 minutes, which I don't normally do, especially on such a hot day.
I am certain the tank repair is not a factor. I vacummed out the tank multiple times during the process and any particles that might have remained were sealed down under the epoxy. The epoxy itself is incredibly sticky and had the consistency of warm honey until it hardened. It is thixotropic which enables it to make an extremely good bond on imperfect surfaces without air bubles etc.
It dried to a hard but pliable texture....very interesting stuff.
I also had suggestions from the Aerovee forum as they are quite familiar with this problem and made suggestions such as thicker insulation (Pipe insulation covered in aluminum tape) and ducting of air specifically for the fuel lines.
I'll see what I can do in that regard, but heat on the fuel lines is never a good thing and anything can be done to minimize it is wise.
--------------------
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
| Login |
|
|
In order to fully utilize the abilities of this board, you are required to register as a member. Registration is free, and allows you to do lots of things including turning on or off certain features of this board. Register now! |
| Forum Rules & Description |
Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest
Who Can Post New Topics? Any administrator or moderator
Who Can Post Replies? Any administrator or moderator
Who Can Edit Posts? Any original author
|
Discussions on all engine related matters |
| Currently Active Users: 713 |
There are currently 0 members and 713 guests on the boards. | Most users ever online was 42535 on 04-07-2026 02:43 AM
|
| Search This Forum |
|
|
|
 |
Powered by CuteCast v2.0 BETA 2
Copyright © 2001-2003 ArtsCore Studios
|
|