New Forum
THIS FORUM IS NOW CLOSED/REPLACED DUE TO LACK OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT. YOU MAY STILL BROWSE AND READ POSTS, BUT YOU MAY NOT POST OR REPLY. YOUR CURRENT PASSWORD SHOULD WORK ON THE NEW SITE.

Please visit the new forum at New Fournier Forum

Important notice
Please remember that people from all over the world read and post on this forum, and that every country has its own rules, regulations and standards. This forum is based in the USA and so much of the information posted here is for the benefit of people who operate aircraft in the experimental/exhibition or experimental/racing categories. Advice given on this forum may be region specific. A person from Europe, for example, may make suggestions perfectly appropriate for a U.S reader, although not acceptable in his home country!

Please take this into account and carefully consult the authorities, standards and approved documentation where you fly.
Fournier Forums Upload picture | User Cp  |  Register  |  Members  |  Search  |  Help
    |- Fournier Aircraft > Engines Post New Topic   Post A Reply
Tuned Exhaust Length? printer friendly version
next newest post | next oldest post
Author Messages
Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Thursday, March 25, 2010 @ 10:44 AM  

Hi Guys,

I have become interested in optimising my exhaust lengths to get maximum performance out of my new 1750cc engine.

Some years ago this article appeared in the Birtish homebuilders' magazine, Popular Flying (now re-named Light Aviation). If the authorities (Francis Donaldson) approved this installation -- and he did -- then presumably the calculations were checked as correct.

http://www.jodel.com/index.asp?p=exhaust&engines

If I substitute the numbers for my motor (42.5° BDC and 3,600rpm and 444cc per cylinder) I make the ideal exhaust length 52.3 inches and the ideal diameter 33.6 mm, which is extremely close to the 32mm diameter of the exhaust ports and 1 3/8 inch pipe which is standard.

However... in http://www.piteraq.dk/flight/exhaust.html Daniel J.J. Adam seems to correct his assumptions, and if I understand his English, I think we should substitute 850 (180-3) in the top line of the equation, because that's where the standard camshaft closes the exhaust valve. This gives me basically forty inches, which is not far away from what we already have, although as I understand it, there should be no holes in the sides and a straight cut-off end.

Can anybody out there either confirm my understanding of this science or correct my math (sums were never my strong point)?

Yours, Bob

jb92563
Unregistered

Posted Thursday, March 25, 2010 @ 01:59 PM  

The concept of a tuned exhaust for a 4 stroke engine is based on the assumption that an obstruction free run of pipe expidites the oxygen depleted exhaust out of the cylinders more completely and quickly, giving the engine better "breathing" and a fresher (more oxygen) charge of air for combustion.

I like the explanation in the article below to understand what is happing in 4 stroke tuning.

http://www.bgideas.demon.co.uk/tmanual/Tm_Ch4.pdf

Another good one is "How to Hotrod VW engines"

http://books.google.com/books?id=0EaJuPx71_oC&pg=PA43&lpg=PA43&dq=4+cycle+tuned+exhaust+for+VW&source=bl&ots=hK6OCnFcky&sig=YH8OnNaZosQ6GCMhEEBTG-HhaBk&hl=en&ei=n6SrS6XGH4L-tQOatZXdDA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7&ved=0CC8Q6AEwBg

I think that it can be made even easier for our RF4D's because of the existing exhaust layout.

Simply get the right length pipe for each cylinder, cut straight off and your done.

You will not get much additional muffling but if it is just performance you are after then its the lightest and easiest to make.

Going the 4 into 2 into 1 will get you even better muffling and perhaps a bit more performance if everything measures out perfectly but at more complicated piping and weight.

Simply extending the current pipes to the right length sounds like a no brainer. (And cutting out the holed section)

Also, dont forget that better "breathing" will require the mixture to be adjust more rich.

If you were already rich you are in good shape, but some monitoring of CHT and EGT temps would be a good idea.

I wonder if cylinder head temps and fuel consumption is effected very much?

Ray

[Edit by jb92563 on Thursday, March 25, 2010 @ 02:13 PM]

--------------------

Post New Topic   Post A Reply Jump to:
Contact Us | cfiamerica.com | Privacy Policy All times are GMT -4 Hours.
Welcome to The Fournier Forum, Guest!  
Login
Username :
Password :
In order to fully utilize the abilities of this board, you are required to register as a member. Registration is free, and allows you to do lots of things including turning on or off certain features of this board. Register now!
Forum Rules & Description
Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest
Who Can Post New Topics? Any administrator or moderator
Who Can Post Replies? Any administrator or moderator
Who Can Edit Posts? Any original author
Discussions on all engine related matters
Currently Active Users: 69
There are currently 0 members and 69 guests on the boards. | Most users ever online was 42535 on 04-07-2026 02:43 AM
Search This Forum
Search Keywords: Search From:
Powered by CuteCast v2.0 BETA 2
Copyright © 2001-2003 ArtsCore Studios