Important notice
Please remember that people from all over the world read and post on this forum, and that every country has its own rules, regulations and standards. This forum is based in the USA and so much of the information posted here is for the benefit of people who operate aircraft in the experimental/exhibition or experimental/racing categories. Advice given on this forum may be region specific. A person from Europe, for example, may make suggestions perfectly appropriate for a U.S reader, although not acceptable in his home country!

Please take this into account and carefully consult the authorities, standards and approved documentation where you fly.
Fournier Forums Upload picture | User Cp  |  Register  |  Members  |  Search  |  Help
    |- Fournier Aircraft > Maintenance Post New Topic   Post A Reply
Broken outrigger fitting printer friendly version
next newest post | next oldest post
Author Messages
dannparks
Sergeant Major

Gender: Male
Location: Parkside Airpark, Battle Ground, WA
Registered: Oct 2006
Status: Offline
Posts: 391

Click here to see the profile for dannparks Visit https://picasaweb.google.com/111628310900713778468/RF4D_N2188?noredirect=1 Send email to dannparks Send private message to dannparks Find more posts by dannparks Edit or delete this message Reply w/Quote
Posted Monday, October 5, 2015 @ 01:49 AM  

A few days ago after landing, I noticed that a fitting on the right outrigger had broken. It is a rear support post that seems to be unique to the outrigger refit on N2188.

Not sure why it choose that moment to break - the main post is not loose and it wasn't a hard landing or anything. It seems to be a threaded fitting that broke at the threads. It doesn't really have any pressure on it, but it does get a lot of vibration rolling on the grass. Here is a picture of the left side:

Does anyone know the history of this retrofit? And if the part might still be available? A check through ACS didn't find a match.

And I guess the other question would be if these bracing bars are really necessary. The main post goes through the spar and it seems to be plenty strong without the support. And I don't see any other RF4s with this kind of bracing bar -- although the tube holding the nylon rod does seem to stick out below the wing longer than most.

I would prefer to replace the part if I can.

Any information and/or advice appreciated.

--------------------
Dann Parks • RF4D #4051 N2188 • now flying!
Pictures at: https://picasaweb.google.com/111628310900713778468/RF4D_N2188?noredirect=1

Jorgen
Captain

Gender: Male
Location: Lund, Sweden
Registered: Apr 2007
Status: Offline
Posts: 833

Click here to see the profile for Jorgen Send email to Jorgen Send private message to Jorgen Find more posts by Jorgen Edit or delete this message Reply w/Quote
Posted Monday, October 5, 2015 @ 02:09 PM  

Hi Dann,
sorry about that but I think that can be fixed, you just have to choose among several options. I'm sure you know the original design was an "U"-shaped hoop with two attachment points and someone chose to modify "N2188" from the original hoop to something in between the hoop and the common single plastic rod- modification. I haven't seen your version before and I'm not sure I understand why the reinforcing arm was thought to be needed. Maybe it was thought to allow a single rod mod without changing the forward fitting to a reinforced one?

The "single rod"- modification are available in a couple of different ("reinforced")versions, the one used on RF 5:s is a fitting attached to the spar, the fitting I have on "SE-XST" is drilled into a wooden block in one of the ribs. I posted drawings of that fitting a while ago, you might recall Bob Grimstead was concerned about the fact that there was no sweep in the rod. I'm not sure that is so much of a problem myself and the reason brings me to why I think you broke your fitting:

When you taxi there is little stress on the outriggers and even if they are pointed a bit forward in a tail low situation I haven't seen any problems because of that. However, if you bang the outrigger into the ground in the landing phase while you're still flying, the stress levels are considerable. I think it's imperative to keep your outriggers short to minimize the risk of hitting the ground while landing, perhaps with a X-wind. Since I shortened my outriggers I have had significantly less outrigger problems. I suggest you shorten yours and to do that and still have a long enough rod left to dissipate the bending forces you might have to modify your modification;) I agree, your fitting protrudes longer under the wing than other fittings I have seen.

May the 4's be with you/ Jörgen

[Edit by Jorgen on Monday, October 5, 2015 @ 02:11 PM]

SteveBeaver
General

Gender: Male
Location: Columbus, Ohio - USA
Registered: Jan 2007
Status: Offline
Posts: 454

Click here to see the profile for SteveBeaver Visit http://www.bucker.info Send email to SteveBeaver Send private message to SteveBeaver Find more posts by SteveBeaver Edit or delete this message Reply w/Quote
Posted Monday, October 5, 2015 @ 04:25 PM    YIM

Perhaps something like this would work? "Single-sided, but still stronger than the threaded part.

http://www.mcmaster.com/#hanger-bolts/=z8lpjo

D. Porter
Sergeant First Class

Gender: Male
Location: Ventura, CA
Registered: Apr 2012
Status: Offline
Posts: 84

Click here to see the profile for D. Porter Send email to D. Porter Send private message to D. Porter Find more posts by D. Porter Edit or delete this message Reply w/Quote
Posted Monday, October 5, 2015 @ 08:26 PM  

Quote:
Originally posted by Jorgen Since I shortened my outriggers I have had significantly less outrigger problems.
Hi Jorgen,

Just curious, how short are your outriggers? Can you give us a measurement to bottom of lowered wing tip?

Thanks,

Don

--------------------
Don
RF4D #4054 N1700F Rectimo 1400cc

dannparks
Sergeant Major

Gender: Male
Location: Parkside Airpark, Battle Ground, WA
Registered: Oct 2006
Status: Offline
Posts: 391

Click here to see the profile for dannparks Visit https://picasaweb.google.com/111628310900713778468/RF4D_N2188?noredirect=1 Send email to dannparks Send private message to dannparks Find more posts by dannparks Edit or delete this message Reply w/Quote
Posted Wednesday, October 7, 2015 @ 01:48 AM  

A better indicator of outrigger length as it pertains to performance is to measure the high-wheel clearance. Things like the compression of the main gear and the angle of the strut can affect the running ground clearance, so high-wheel divided by 2 is a better indicator. My high-wheel clearance is 9" (4 1/2" per side) and I like it for now. There is an existing thread on this - search high wheel.

___________

Thanks for the advice on the broken part. So instead of trying to change the system or find a new part, I just fixed the old one. Cut off the broken stub and welded it to a 1/4-28 aircraft bolt. Fits perfectly.

Fits perfectly. It sticks out a tiny bit further, but won't really change any angles. It is certainly a lot stronger.

It probably broke from a hard hit on rough grass and a weak part (it broke right where the threads start). Nothing on the main tube is loose (the main tube goes through the wing), but it is wood and there is a tiny flex. Vibration over time and a sharp hit was probably too much for it. The nylon rod is angled back and bends easily, so I don't think there is undo force on it. But a sharp jolt could be transmitted to the part. I'll keep an eye on both sides.

--------------------
Dann Parks • RF4D #4051 N2188 • now flying!
Pictures at: https://picasaweb.google.com/111628310900713778468/RF4D_N2188?noredirect=1

D. Porter
Sergeant First Class

Gender: Male
Location: Ventura, CA
Registered: Apr 2012
Status: Offline
Posts: 84

Click here to see the profile for D. Porter Send email to D. Porter Send private message to D. Porter Find more posts by D. Porter Edit or delete this message Reply w/Quote
Posted Wednesday, October 7, 2015 @ 08:17 PM  

Quote:
Originally posted by dannparks
A better indicator of outrigger length as it pertains to performance is to measure the high-wheel clearance. Things like the compression of the main gear and the angle of the strut can affect the running ground clearance, so high-wheel divided by 2 is a better indicator. My high-wheel clearance is 9" (4 1/2" per side) and I like it for now. There is an existing thread on this - search high wheel.

Thanks Dann, I found that thread.

--------------------
Don
RF4D #4054 N1700F Rectimo 1400cc

Jorgen
Captain

Gender: Male
Location: Lund, Sweden
Registered: Apr 2007
Status: Offline
Posts: 833

Click here to see the profile for Jorgen Send email to Jorgen Send private message to Jorgen Find more posts by Jorgen Edit or delete this message Reply w/Quote
Posted Monday, October 12, 2015 @ 04:42 PM  

Quote:
Originally posted by Jorgen Since I shortened my outriggers I have had significantly less outrigger problems.

Quote:
Originally posted by D. Porter

Hi Jorgen,

Just curious, how short are your outriggers? Can you give us a measurement to bottom of lowered wing tip?

Thanks,

Don

Hi Don,
went for a spin in the 4 today and actually remembered to measure my high wheel clearance, I'm at 26 cm (more than 10¨) which I'm happy with- I wouldn't want them longer. Any disadvantages? Well, I'm not worried about side forces on the main gear, perhaps there is a higher risk of hitting your wingtips on taxiway lights but if the taxiway is that narrow you'll have that problem regardless.

May the 4's be with you/ Jörgen

[IMG]/IMG]

Post New Topic   Post A Reply Jump to:
Contact Us | cfiamerica.com | Privacy Policy All times are GMT -4 Hours.
Welcome to The Fournier Forum, Guest!  
Login
Username :
Password :
In order to fully utilize the abilities of this board, you are required to register as a member. Registration is free, and allows you to do lots of things including turning on or off certain features of this board. Register now!
Forum Rules & Description
Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest
Who Can Post New Topics? Any registered user
Who Can Post Replies? Any registered user
Who Can Edit Posts? Any original author
Tips for maintaining Fournier Motor gliders
Currently Active Users: 96
There are currently 0 members and 96 guests on the boards. | Most users ever online was 822 on 08-01-2020 10:15 PM
Search This Forum
Search Keywords: Search From:
Powered by CuteCast v2.0 BETA 2
Copyright © 2001-2003 ArtsCore Studios