New Forum
THIS FORUM IS NOW CLOSED/REPLACED DUE TO LACK OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT. YOU MAY STILL BROWSE AND READ POSTS, BUT YOU MAY NOT POST OR REPLY. YOUR CURRENT PASSWORD SHOULD WORK ON THE NEW SITE.

Please visit the new forum at New Fournier Forum

Important notice
Please remember that people from all over the world read and post on this forum, and that every country has its own rules, regulations and standards. This forum is based in the USA and so much of the information posted here is for the benefit of people who operate aircraft in the experimental/exhibition or experimental/racing categories. Advice given on this forum may be region specific. A person from Europe, for example, may make suggestions perfectly appropriate for a U.S reader, although not acceptable in his home country!

Please take this into account and carefully consult the authorities, standards and approved documentation where you fly.
Fournier Forums Upload picture | User Cp  |  Register  |  Members  |  Search  |  Help
    |- Fournier Aircraft > Maintenance Post New Topic   Post A Reply
Fitting inside printer friendly version
next newest post | next oldest post
Author Messages
dannparks
Unregistered

Posted Tuesday, October 31, 2006 @ 06:54 PM  

Since the French aren't known for being exceptionally tall, the RF4 is quite a squeeze for those of us who are on the tall side. I'm 6-2 and find it more than a bit cramped. What are others doing to get more space?

I am working now to move the rudder peddles forward a couple of inches. My knee hits the throttle and I am going to move it above the longeron using the same bracket, but running the cable through a slot in the panel and a new hole in the panel bulkhead. I am also looking to add a recontoured seat support for a little more layed down positioning. Even with thin cushions, the cross-bar at the back of the canopy hits my sholders, so I was thinking of replacing it with a bent back version that would still clear the fuselage when opened. And finally, the control stick will need to be reshaped to move it back a bit. This seems like a lot, but it I've got the plane totally disassembled, so now is the time.

Any other suggestions or observations about ergonomic issues?

--------------------

Admin
Unregistered

Posted Tuesday, October 31, 2006 @ 07:29 PM  

Those are the things I intend to try as well. I have a friend with a programmable tube bender so I was thinking of making a run of nicely curved control sticks. I'll let you know if that comes to pass.

Steve

dannparks
Unregistered

Posted Tuesday, October 31, 2006 @ 11:36 PM  

I will try to post/send a diagram (with dimensions) of the reshaping of the stick I was thinking about. It requires a bend back coming out of the boot and then a sharp angle cut and weld for the grip part. This will also provide an offset so that a motorcycle hand brake (if I use one) will not hit the wheel cover when the stick is moved to the down position.

--------------------

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, January 3, 2007 @ 04:17 AM  

Hi Folks,

I guess the RF4's cockpit was built around Rene Fournier, and as you can see from the web site photos, he is not a big guy.

I am 6ft 1 in, and I do fit, but with a squeeze. Rob Dorsey, Richard Bach and John Taylor are much bigger than me, and they fitted too. I would advise caution in modifying the airplane. If you move the rudder pedals forward you might reduce their travel, then how are you going to recover from a spin? or even make a crosswind landing, or turn through 180 on the ground?

I fiddled with cushions, foam etc for a year or more. Here is my final solution:

You do not want 'squishy' normal furniture foam, otherwise you will sink when you pull G and your eye line changes, also your seatbelts go slack... not nice. If you land heavily (maybe wheel-up like me last month) or crash, compressible foam compresses immediately and the bottom end of your spine hits the wooden structure under the seat. Then your vertebrae compress. This can paralyse you. Or kill you if the top of your spine goes upwards into your head. Not nice.

So... I lay half an inch of styrofoam in the flat, recessed wooden base (I know it's flammable, but so's the whole airplane). Over that I have a standard 16" by 18" sheet of two-inch thick conformal foam (Dynafoam, Temperfoam, Confor foam -- all pretty much the same stuff, you can get it from Aircraft Spruce). This only compresses slowly, so it saves your back and is extremely comfortable to sit on. It's what Oregon Aero use for their wonderfully comfortable seats.

Behind me I have the original moulded black fiberglass seat back (dished, to take a parachute). Into that dish goes an ordinary hunk of foam, cut to shape. Over that I use a one-inch sheet of confomal foam, with half a three-inch block as a lumbar support at the bottom of it. My wife sewed black covers for all these foam sheets/blocks, and the job's done.

My left knee tucks just under the throttle, with my right knee pretty free under the trim lever. My head touches the canopy (so I can see forward as much as possible in the nose-high landing attitude), and I use a Peltor headset in a 'universal' leather helmet. The Peltor has a thin band over your head, not like David Clark's thick head bands. An ANR kit completes the comfort suite.

Yes, the canopy rear bar touches my back, but it's not uncomfortable.

I flew 3:30 straight off on a cross-country, then another two hours in formation on the same day. Flew a low-level aeros display at the end, with NO discomfort.

Good luck.

Bob

[size=small][Edit by Bob Grimstead on [TIME]1168831147[/TIME]][/size]

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, January 3, 2007 @ 04:23 AM  

Look on the site for a photo of my cranked stick.

I do not have long arms, but I do have long legs and am over six feet tall, so I found it hard to get full forward stick for the inverted glides (JT of the Skyhawks says you don't have enough forward elevator in a Fournier to stall it upside-down, and it seems he's probably right, although the feel does go very odd laterally at full forward stick - a bit wing-wobbly, as if it is just about to flick).

Anyway, because of my short reach, I found I wasn't getting the stick far enough forward when rolling vertically. I knew some Fourniers have a cranked stick, so I removed mine (not an easy job) got four or five inches of 4130 tubing (inch diameter, from memory) cut it to shape and had it welded (by a proper FAA welder) into my stick. By making the mitres not quite 45 degrees I also got a tiny bit more stick length, to give me more leverage and a better feel, both in pitch and roll.

The new stick position took a little getting used to, but it has made everything a lot easier.

It's really difficult to get the stick out. It's a haemorrhoid fitting (a pain in the ass). But it's easy enough to saw it and fit the middle bit.

Good Luck.

Bob

Mira Slovak
Unregistered

Posted Saturday, January 13, 2007 @ 10:52 PM  

I have few long hours in RF-4 and I can't find anything wrong with the cockpit size. When I was younger I was 6.2" I had no problems in the cockpit, now in my young age of 77, I have shrunk to 6.1" and still no problems. Of course, I prefer 747 first class confort. /If I can get a free pass/.
Guys, leave the cockpit alone.
Fly Safe.
Mira Slovak.
JamesB
Unregistered

Posted Thursday, February 1, 2007 @ 12:27 PM  

Quote:
Originally posted by dannparks
Any other suggestions or observations about ergonomic issues?

Regarding headroom, I have traded my standard David Clark headset for a Lightspeed Mach 1 "in-ear" headset. Consistent with the reviews, the foam in-ear tips are ok. Am awaiting delivery of custom made ear tips to get better noise reduction. Regardless, the lighter weight, smaller size and increased head room are appreciated.

dannparks
Unregistered

Posted Saturday, February 3, 2007 @ 02:21 AM  

I have a Clarity Aloft in-ear headset that I use in the RV6A and it is fabulous. Incredibly quiet and comfortable. I was hoping the 4D would be quiet enough to not need headsets at all, just the old fashion speaker and hand mic. But that is probably not a realistic option. An in-ear headset would certainly allow your hair to touch the canopy without scratching it.

--------------------

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Sunday, February 4, 2007 @ 09:21 PM  

Hi Guys,

You certainly need some sort of ear protection in Fourniers. The un-muffled exhausts exit just a foot in front of the cockpit, and will quickly make your ears ring without protection.

I use Peltors, becuse they are light, with a thin head band and fairly good noise supression. For aerobatics, I put them into a 'universal' leather helmet, so they don't shoot off when I'm upside-down (although you can keep them on by tying a shoe-lace from one ear cup to the other, under your chin). I recently fitted an ANR kit, which helps deaden the airflow noise quite a lot, but still lets you hear the engine in the background. It certainly makes the radio (a hand-held Icom) clearer.

For optimum headroom, in-ear headsets are a great idea, but.... When I flew Boeing 747s with British Airways, for a while in the 1980s they issues pilots with the Pacific Plantronics in-ear headsets. They were light, and kept out the background noise quite well. But you only had to turn up the volume a tiny bit too high for a little too long for them to damage your hearing. Many of those Jumbo pilots are now as deaf as the old piston-airliner pilots.

By all means use in-ear hedsets, but I advise you please to keep the volume down as low as you can get away with. Any noise coming through that earpiece is just fractions of an inch from your eardrum and the tiny, delicate scilia inside. Once each one is snapped off by excessive noise, it never grows back, and you lose a tiny bit of your high-tone hearing. I'm NOT saying don't use in-ear headsets; you can do the same damage by having the volume too high on your I-pod or with any headset, it just seeems that the in-ear ones have a potential for more direct and immediate damage.

Good luck.

Yours, Bob

dannparks
Unregistered

Posted Saturday, April 19, 2008 @ 02:43 AM  

Collin and I have been looking at getting some canopies made that are a little taller. Here is a Photoshopped photo that shows what we have in mind. There is a shop in Florida called Todds Canopies that can make them for a reasonable price (somewhere around $400). They won't have the sliding door, so some venting will need to be worked out. We'll post progress.

--------------------

SteveBeaver
Unregistered

Posted Saturday, April 19, 2008 @ 08:38 AM  

Dan/Collin,

I would welcome the opportunity to buy a canopy like that. Mine has far too many cracks and many of them were started by my head I look forward to hearing your progress.

Steve

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Saturday, April 19, 2008 @ 11:04 PM  

Hi Guys,

That little sliding window was itself the source of many of the cracks in both the canopies I have used so far.

You don't need it for ventillation if you fit the vent hoses you can see on my Bob's Mods page, although you will need either to remove the inspection flap into the rear fuselage (as I have) or to put an opening in it, to allow all the incoming air out of your cockpit for good airflow.

Either way, you should put netting or mesh over the resulting hole, so that small items don't migrate into your rear fuselage and jam your flying controls. The weather was so hot for my Red Bull display that I removed the flap, but didn't get around to putting mesh over it. Of course, during my first routine, the plastic battery cover came off the ANR battery box and whirled straight through that hole and right down to the far end of the fuselage. Not being magnetic, it was difficult to retrieve -- eventually achieved with a long pole and lots of duct tape. I have mesh over that hole now.

However, much more importantly, without the little hole, there is no way of opening the canopy from the outside. Ask my buddy Peter, whose BD-5 ended its last flight in a circle of flaming fuel with him unconscious inside, why that's important.

I have been trying to figure out an alternative way of opening the canopy from outside, without compromising the strength of the fuselage by cutting a hole or slot in it. Schelicher Ka 13 gliders have a kind of sliding lever that slides between the canopy rail and the fuselage top longeron, with pins engaging into lugs like the canopy frame's hinges. It is not as elegant, simple, light and neat as Rene Fournier's method, though.

Does anybody else have any good ideas?

Yours, Bob

dannparks
Unregistered

Posted Sunday, April 20, 2008 @ 01:19 AM  

The original latch is a good design, you just need to be able to rotate the hook from the outside too -- especially in emergencies. Vans RV latch is similar, but it uses an over-center cam to eliminate the need for the little hook to hold the handle on the inside, and there is a streamlined handle on the outside. It would require drilling a 1/4" to 5/16" hole through, or just below, the longeron for the rotating shaft (below would be better). It may be that some RV parts could be used. I'll post some photos of RV latches for ideas. Is there really a need for a lock?

--------------------

joethepro
Unregistered

Posted Tuesday, April 29, 2008 @ 01:26 AM  

since you only need to latch it while inside a simple two tabs with a small master lock for external use when on the ground and the orginal latch system should work. mine is just two pieces of bent metal with a hole drilled in it one attached to the canopy one to the airframe you can pass a lock through both it works great to secure the plane at airshows
Jorgen
Unregistered

Posted Thursday, May 1, 2008 @ 05:06 PM  

Hi Guys,
I don´t know about only latching from the inside- just yesterday I did what I´ve promised myself never to do again: forgetting to latch the canopy while groundhandling the 4´. It was quite windy so the canopy blew open, that´s NOT good for the hinges (or rather the wooden screws in them). I´ve also had the canopy open itself in the air after take-off from a bumpy strip once, the latch had come of the stop. Since then I´ve adjusted the latch so it´s nice and tight. Whatever modification you make to that latch, I suggest you keep in mind that it might unlatch itself in bumpy conditions (most of us still have the rubber bungees, right?).

Take 5(b) just 4 fun/ Jörgen, SE-UDI, SE-XST

[Edit by Jorgen on Friday, May 2, 2008 @ 02:21 PM]

dannparks
Unregistered

Posted Friday, May 2, 2008 @ 02:16 AM  

Well, it looks like there does need to be some way to latch it closed from the outside. Thanks for the informative post. If anyone has any ideas, please post.

--------------------

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Saturday, May 24, 2008 @ 01:29 PM  

Hi Guys,

We are getting a little off topic here, but Dann's original question was about moving the rudder pedals forward etc.

Our British Fournier has had this modification done to it. The pedals have been moved about two inches forwards, and links around two inches (5 cm) long have been inserted into the rudder cables. I think the links came from a Schleicher glider (K13?) You can still get full pedal travel, and the pedals are still at the same angle.

The result is a rather more reclined seating position, which might be more G-tolerant (Matthew says it's like a Sukhoi, but I wouldn't know) but it does mean I can get full left aileron, because my knee is now below the throttle. Unfortunately it makes my back ache, so we are experimenting with improved lumbar support and different cushion thicknesses (rolled up towels for initial assessment).

We'll let you know the results, and I'll post some photos when I can get back to my own computer.

Yours, Bob

flyingkroeger
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, May 28, 2008 @ 06:20 PM  

Hi Bob,

The mods on your UK ship are exactly what the other Bob in South Australia did to fit into his Fournier – he’s a tall fellow. I think he inserted some sort of wedge between seat back and cushion. I guess some cut Styrofoam would do the trick, but I can ask him if you want.

Anyways, when I sat in his Fournier just before buying mine, I found the reclined position very comfortable and glider style.

BR

Tim

flyingkroeger
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, May 28, 2008 @ 06:49 PM  

Dann,

Sorry, this is a bit off topic - I had a look at your site, great pictures by the way. Where did you get the MSFS Fournier, do you have a link? So far I only found the Super Ximango and the RF6B...

BR

Tim

andy1
Unregistered

Posted Thursday, May 29, 2008 @ 05:40 AM  

I got my new sheat cushion from Oregon Aero. I put in the the "box" of the RF4D "seat" and got the thing more comfortable than ever before and i addition have now enough headroom for my six feet. Earlier there were some problems especially in heavy thermals. On the other hand, I've seen four inches taller guys flying with success.

-A-

--------------------

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Friday, July 4, 2008 @ 04:53 PM  

Hi Guys,

As most of you know, I am generally not in favour of modifying a very well designed aeroplane like the RF4, but...

The red, British one we just bought has had its rudder pedals moved forwards a couple of inches, and Ka 13 (we think) links have been inserted in the rudder cables.

The result is a little more legroom, and I now can just get my left knee below the throttle, so I can apply ful left aileron.

However... the seating position is very reclined and we both find it uncomfortable. Combined with the low canopy (also ex Ka 13) it is difficult to see out forwards too.

But nevertheless, I thought I'd show you a photo of the mod, so you can incorporate it if you want.

Yours, Bob

[Edit by Bob Grimstead on Friday, February 6, 2009 @ 10:42 PM]

[Edit by Bob Grimstead on Friday, February 6, 2009 @ 10:43 PM]

[Edit by Bob Grimstead on Friday, February 6, 2009 @ 10:43 PM]

dannparks
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, July 16, 2008 @ 02:14 AM  

Hi Flyingkroeger. I think I got the FR4D flight sim model here:

http://scramlings.de/~scram729/D/download.html

Toward the bottom of the page...

I couldn't get the gear to go up and down. Hope you have better luck.

--------------------

Sam M.
Unregistered

Posted Friday, February 6, 2009 @ 05:35 PM  

to my 5'6 135lb frame the RF cockpit is Just right! Just hope i dont grow anymore

[Edit by Sam M. on Friday, February 6, 2009 @ 05:37 PM]

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Friday, February 6, 2009 @ 10:51 PM  

Hi Guys,

I finally found that photo of the forward rudder pedal in our red RF4. It is annual inspection time for the blue one, so I am incorporating the same modification on that one. Mostly because it allows me to get full left aileron, by ensuring my left knee is below the throttle.

I did most of the mod yesterday. It took an afternoon.
You have to make up a couple of wooden blocks to go under the floor to support the pedals.


Then you have to make the links to extend the cables. Neither job is very hard or time-consuming, once you have removed the snail (wheel cover) and in my case, the wing, too.

When I dismantled my pedals from their hinges, I was surprised to see how much the hinge pin holes had worn into the floor-mounted brackets. All four were badly ovalised. That's in a 1,300-hour airplane (yes, mostly aerobatics for the past 300 hours). I'll get some more photos later today and put them under 'maintenance'.

It might be worth a look during your next big inspection.

Once everything was reassembled, it became clear that it would be very difficult to move the pedals more than two inches forwards from their original position, because the outboard side of the pedal would hit a vertical fuselage member at full forward rudder travel. There would also be a possible interference between the pedal stop (a block of wood on the front of the pedal) and the variometer's vacuum flask etc.

So far, I am coping with the original pedal return springs, although of course they now have slightly less effect. I'll let you all know if I have to change them. I suspect I might, because the red airplane had them changed.

By the way, don't be confused. These photos are from the blue Fournier, but it was originally red when it lived in France, and they didn't bother to re-spray under the lower cheek cowlings.

Yours, Bob

[Edit by Bob Grimstead on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 @ 10:07 PM]

[Edit by Bob Grimstead on Tuesday, February 10, 2009 @ 11:46 PM]

[Edit by Bob Grimstead on Saturday, November 6, 2010 @ 12:08 PM]

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Thursday, February 19, 2009 @ 10:42 PM  

Hi Guys,

Here's the best photo I can get (admittedly not very good) of the link needed to move the rudder pedals forward.

It was made up from 4130 by my good friend Rob Felton.

It would be difficult to move the pedals more than two inches (5 cm/500mm) forwards, because then they would start to hit the upright side member, and also you would need to fit shorter 'pull' springs ahead of the pedals. Not easy to find shorter spirngs with the same elasticity. But it might be possible for our very long-legged friends. It would probably be necessary to slim down the pedals a bit, and also to remove the variometer's vacuum flask, but then you might just be able to move them four inches or so forward from their original position.

Yours, Bob

Post New Topic   Post A Reply Jump to:
Contact Us | cfiamerica.com | Privacy Policy All times are GMT -4 Hours.
Welcome to The Fournier Forum, Guest!  
Login
Username :
Password :
In order to fully utilize the abilities of this board, you are required to register as a member. Registration is free, and allows you to do lots of things including turning on or off certain features of this board. Register now!
Forum Rules & Description
Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest
Who Can Post New Topics? Any administrator or moderator
Who Can Post Replies? Any administrator or moderator
Who Can Edit Posts? Any original author
Tips for maintaining Fournier Motor gliders
Currently Active Users: 753
There are currently 0 members and 753 guests on the boards. | Most users ever online was 42535 on 04-07-2026 02:43 AM
Search This Forum
Search Keywords: Search From:
Powered by CuteCast v2.0 BETA 2
Copyright © 2001-2003 ArtsCore Studios