New Forum
THIS FORUM IS NOW CLOSED/REPLACED DUE TO LACK OF TECHNICAL SUPPORT. YOU MAY STILL BROWSE AND READ POSTS, BUT YOU MAY NOT POST OR REPLY. YOUR CURRENT PASSWORD SHOULD WORK ON THE NEW SITE.

Please visit the new forum at New Fournier Forum

Important notice
Please remember that people from all over the world read and post on this forum, and that every country has its own rules, regulations and standards. This forum is based in the USA and so much of the information posted here is for the benefit of people who operate aircraft in the experimental/exhibition or experimental/racing categories. Advice given on this forum may be region specific. A person from Europe, for example, may make suggestions perfectly appropriate for a U.S reader, although not acceptable in his home country!

Please take this into account and carefully consult the authorities, standards and approved documentation where you fly.
Fournier Forums Upload picture | User Cp  |  Register  |  Members  |  Search  |  Help
    |- Fournier Aircraft > Engines Post New Topic   Post A Reply
Inverted Engine Lubrication printer friendly version
next newest post | next oldest post
Author Messages
Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, January 3, 2007 @ 00:56 AM  

So, you want to fly aerobatics in your Fournier, but you don’t want to kill the engine?

Loops and barrel rolls are fairly easy if you don’t let the nose drop and you don’t mind too much about their shapes. But when you fly a slow roll, or a four-point roll, or a Cuban eight or a reverse Cuban, the engine stops. Or at least, it stops producing power, although the propeller keeps turning pretty fast. It does that in an inverted glide, too. And the oil pressure drops to nothing. Surely, that’s bad for the engine?

Yes, it is. Do that for long, and you will wear it out very quickly.

British VW expert, Barry Smith, said his first symptom was loud clattering from the valve train. Barry then spent many years designing and perfecting a fully inverted lubrication and fuel-injection system for VW aero engines, and sold them as the Acro VW. Barry is now in semi-retirement, and no longer sells those engines. I cannot even persuade him to sell the drawings, although he ought to be able to make a nice, steady income from that. So I had to find another way to keep my engine lubricated while grossly mal-treating it. Especially since I’d cobbled together a means of helping the engine keep producing power for a few seconds under negative G.

There is an oil additive called molybdenum disulphide (that’s probably disulfide for Americans). It’s black, and is promoted as reducing wear, internal friction etc. All the usual guff. But they market this stuff by putting it into a motor, running it for a while, then unscrewing the sump plug and letting all the oil run out. The engine then continues to run for a couple of minutes. Magic!

I asked an old buddy who once worked in BP’s automotive research department. He said BP tested it, and reckoned it wasn’t worth adding to their lubricants. After all, who would be daft enough to run an engine without any oil in it? Answer? Me!

Three years ago, I poured molybdenum disulphide into my oil. Since then, I’ve flown over 150 hours, with no perceptible change in oil pressure. I take off at full throttle, climb at full throttle and fly ten minutes of aerobatics at full throttle (I don’t even ease it back… ever). Then, when the engine and I are both at red line, I throttle back gently, cool off and land. That’s broadly one hundred fifteen-minute aerobatic sorties, with at least 30 seconds of inverted flight on most of them.

I am NOT recommending that you do this yourselves. I am merely telling you what I have done. It works for me, so far. But, remember, I’m actually trying to wear out this engine, so that I can fit the new 1,750cc one that’s sitting on an oil drum in the corner of my hangar. If and when my little engine wears out or fails, I will tell you. Meanwhile, the additive SEEMS to be beneficial.

Another word of caution. Do not use it when breaking-in your engine. It will probably prevent the cylinders from bedding in properly. But then, you wouldn’t fly aerobatics while breaking in your engine, would you?

Happy (inverted) Fournicating to you all.

Yours, Bob

patrick
Unregistered

Posted Monday, February 5, 2007 @ 07:31 PM  

Bob
A friend - pilot worked in a nuclear research center where they performed long term wear tests for automotive engines ( Mercedes, BMW etc.)
Just for fun he tried adding LiquiMoby in engine oil just to see if the wear was really less.
And it was !
For for explanation nuclear remaining radiation is also used to measure wear ant tear.
But htis is only beein done in special nuclear centers .....
Patrick

--------------------

Jorgen
Unregistered

Posted Friday, May 30, 2008 @ 04:52 PM  

Hi Guys,
some interesting thoughts on "inverted lubrication" for VW´s. I for one mess up in aero´s quite often so I might need to get me a new crank or renovate the valves in a while. The other RF 4 in Sweden had to repair their valve train after a couple of hundred hours, reportedly after "too much of negative aeros". Since the RF 4 is such a nice aeroplane to do aero´s in maybe there is some more to say on this topic- we do want to be able to continue doing aeros without changing engine every third year, don´t we? Sure would be interesting with some follow up on this thread. Is it possible to sum up some "do´s and don´ts"?

Take 5(b) just 4 fun/ Jörgen, SE-UDI, SE-XST

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Sunday, June 1, 2008 @ 03:10 AM  

Hi Jorgen, Guys,

The answer is above.

Add Molybdenum Disulphide (disulfide for our U.S. friends) to your oil -- black stuff, marekted as Molyslip among other names.

It will keep lubricating things whatever your attitude and/or oil pressure.

Barry Smith here in England spent years and thousands of pounds perfecting a Volkswagen lubrication system which works in all attitudes. His 'trigger'? -- clattering from the valve gear, which seems to be the first part of the engine to show wear when lubrication fails.

Incidentally, if you do get this, you only need to replace the cylinder heads, or even just the valve guides, rocker arms, push-rods and shaft bearings. You don't need to overhaul the whole engine.

However, if you use moly, you should not have to do any of this.

I bought my Australian Fournier (the blue one) 4½ years ago. The engine was/is an original 1968 Rectimo and had 960 hours on it. Now it has almost 1,200 hours. That 240 hours of my flying was ALL full-throttle aerobatics, in ALL attitudes, and with plenty of mis-handled manoeuvres.

I have a sort of inverted fuel system that allows a few seconds of power when inverted, with absolutely NO oiil pressure. The moly has prevented excessive wear.

Add moly.

It is expensive, but it will solve your no-oil-pressure lubrication problems.

Yours, Bob

Sam M.
Unregistered

Posted Tuesday, September 30, 2008 @ 05:01 PM  

http://www.ellison-fluid-systems.com/products/efs2.htm

have you seen this bob?

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Tuesday, October 14, 2008 @ 02:07 AM  

Hi Sam,

Yes, I would like to have one, but they discontinued production a few years ago.

And of course you do need a fuel pump plus a flop tube in the fuel tank for continuous fuel feed.

Be warned, the Ellison throttle bodies (and the other similar systems) don't have a float bowl, so there's no reservoir to absorb bubbles in the fuel, so vapour locking can be a real problem.

I am working on an inverted fuel system that works with the standard gravity fuel flow and standard carburettor,. I had it working well a couple of years ago, but now it doesn't work so well. More experimentation needed.

I'll let you all know the results.

Yours, Bob

Sam M.
Unregistered

Posted Tuesday, October 14, 2008 @ 01:32 PM  

Thanks i would love to get an inverted fuel system. the only times i have gone negitive the prop stops after 3 seconds if im below 120 mph. the first time it happend i was able to glide back to the airport. then after that i experimented to see what speed it took to get the prop spining, it took 125 mph. we are still looking on making or buying the hand starter gears, since ours are stripped.
Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, October 15, 2008 @ 01:01 AM  

Hi Sam,

If you can find somebody to make the small starter gear and the big propeller back-plate, I need one of each, and I think Paul Cooper would like one of each too, because he has no starter and is getting into aerobatics. Getting three (or more) made in a batch might reduce the cost. If you can find somebody to make them, start a new thread and advertise, you'll probably get a few more people, particularly if you mention that pulling the starter handle while the prop's turning will strip the gears, something most of us have done at some time, so it's good to have a spare.

Did I already say that it might not be wise for you to fly hammerheads or upward vertical rolls below 3,000 feet until your starter is fixed? Ditto humpty-bumps. I often get the engine stopping on each of these manoeuvres, but with my coarse propeller and low compressions the engine usually starts easily again. With your new motor and fine-pitched prop you'll have a lot more trouble. Still you're a glider pilot, so it ain't a disaster. At the height I fly aeros, it could be for me!

Yours, Bob

Sam M.
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, October 15, 2008 @ 01:54 AM  

If we get anywhere on those gears all post a new Post.

Sam

Ps dont laugh but ive gotten my 1/8 rolls up so i can do them cleanly.

[Edit by Sam M. on Wednesday, October 15, 2008 @ 01:58 AM]

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, October 15, 2008 @ 10:12 AM  

Hi Sam, that's great.

I've found it hard to keep the up-line straight-line vertical unless I gradually ease the stick forward a little. That's difficult to do while rolling at the same time, and of course if you overdo it, the engine stops dead. I did once get a half vertical roll by diving to near Vne, pulling at 4g to the exact vertical and hitting full aileron real quick, but I've never succeeded since.

I guess vertical rolls in a Fournier sort the men from the boys, and that makes you a man.
Congratulations.

Didn't fly today in the end. Writing and catching up with six months of mail. Must fly tomorrow, RBAR finals are in a fortnight, haven't flown for a month, HDO has no compressions from six months of neglect and I'd like to give them something new. A Derry turn perhaps, or start off with a four-turn spin. Haven't decided yet.

Rolling circles next year!

Yours, Bob

Sam M.
Unregistered

Posted Wednesday, October 15, 2008 @ 02:09 PM  

when i can 1/4 up hammerhead then im a man. tell then im still just a noobie.

so whats this Derry turn you speak of? never heard of it sounds fun though

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Thursday, October 16, 2008 @ 11:04 PM  

Hi Sam,

The Derry turn was named after the British de Havilland test pilot, John Derry, who invented the manoeuvre.

It is a steep turn in one direction that reverses into a turn the other way, but by rolling through the inverted, rather than rolling through the upright. It looks good if you make the turn reversal pointing towards the crowd.

So, for instance, you pull into a sixty-degree banked turn to the right, continue it through ninety degrees of heading change, then roll right through 240 degrees and stop when you have sixty degrees of bank to the left, then turn left through ninety degrees of heading change.

Of course, in the Fournier your engine stops, but as with all these manoeuvres, provided you keep the nose close to the horizon (by pushing) you do not lose much height, and the airframe is so clean, you don't lose much/any speed either. I do them at around 110 to 120 mph.

I tried a few in our red one, and only lost a maximum of 100 feet each time.

The inverted power system is coming along. I got four or five seconds of inverted power yesterday. Once I've got it sorted, I'll tell you all about it.

Yours, Bob

Sam M.
Unregistered

Posted Friday, October 17, 2008 @ 01:51 PM  

Sounds good i would love to hear about it
Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Monday, October 20, 2008 @ 09:28 PM  

Aha!

So here's that post on Derry Turns -- under Inverted Engine Lubrication.

Getting off topic again. I must try to stop that.

Meanwhile, to see a clip of one performed (not very well, I'm new to them) in an RF4, see:

http://exposureroom.com/members/DARANGULAFILM.aspx/assets/3f9fccb0021e47e494afea93cd2535f0/

Yours, Bob

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Friday, October 24, 2008 @ 10:05 PM  

Hi Sam,

I've just realised that my inverted carb mod won't work on your airplane, because you don't have the standard Zenith 28RXZ carb.

The principle is that, when you turn upside-down, all the fuel in your float bowl falls out through the vent (there is always a vent above the float, to allow for changing air pressure). My mod merely moves that vent to immediately below the venturi (so fuel will trickle down into the venturi when you're upside-down), calibrates it precisely to allow the correct flow of fuel for full-throttle operation, and replaces the vent with another with a U-tube to prevent fuel from leaving the float bowl in any attitude.

The big trick is to get the correct size of vent hole (supplying fuel at 15 litres per hour when inverted). Since you can only enlarge a hole, not make it smaller again, that took dozens of test flights, removing the carburettor and adjusting the hole size after each one.

I'm nearly there now, but that's not much use to you, unless you want to go throught this whole process on yor carb.

Yours, Bob

PS but FIRST, you need to add molybdenum disulfide to your oil, or ensure continued inverted lubrication in some other way, or you'll soon ruin your engine!

Sam M.
Unregistered

Posted Friday, October 24, 2008 @ 10:48 PM  

if you really need to make it smaller you can always sodder it .
thats what we did on our jets.
Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Thursday, November 20, 2008 @ 04:56 AM  

Hi Sam,

Yes, soldering works well on the jets, beause they are brass.

I tried to get solder to adhere to the carburettor body, but it is a different kind of metal (monel?) and I could not get it to stick.

Because of that, I have been very slow and cautious with my investigations.

Where I have had to seal a hole in the carburettor body, I have used Araldite and/or Loctite bearing retainer.

Does anybody have a better idea, because I think I have now made my hole too big.

OOps

Yours, Bob

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Friday, January 29, 2010 @ 10:40 AM  

Hi Guys,

Here is an update on my 'all-attitude lubrication system', prompted by an e-mail from the great Barry Smith, aforementioned inventor of the all-attitude VW lubrication system.

I must start by saying that Barry is now retired, and cannot any longer build Volkswagens or provide information on either his all-attitude lubrication system or his all-attitude fuel injection system, so please do not pester him with queries.
When he has his information in a form he can publish I will be sure to let you all know.
To learn more see below, but please don't contact him. Thanks
http://www.acro.co.uk/

this is what he said:-

Hi Bob – I’ve had a look at the Fournier forum and I though it might be helpful to bring you up to date on a few points mentioned in your blog.
The inverted oil system which I designed back in the early 80s took many hours of development but it was designed as part of the engine and wasn’t something that could be easily adapted to any of the myriad VW conversions and installations. It was designed from the outset as a no-compromise system, and oil pressure is always present whatever attitude you fly.
Now – most acro pilots only tend to consider upside-down flying, but in fact the most important factor is the vertical. My early experiments in the 70s made me very aware of this when I discovered that the camshaft is the first victim to suffer when I did vertical rolls. You aren’t going to spend long in the vertical but I would suggest that it’s something you should consider – if you mod your oil pickup to have a reservoir of oil when in a vertical that might save your engine.

Currently, in retirement, I’m working on making the ACRO AEROBATIC ENGINE affordably reproducible – read the following which is some of my usual reply to people who enquire about the AA and the engine. Note my frustration that there was never a viable market for any of my developments.

I’ve never marketed the AcroAdvanced in any way – although it exceeded all my expectations, and continues to do so. I realised that I had neither the resources nor the necessary aptitude to become a seller of plans or become a kit and engine manufacturer, with all the support that either deserves.

What is an aerobatic aeroplane means different things to different people – for me it means being capable of being competitive in aerobatic competition or to sustain an aerobatic display sequence without height loss – for others anything that’ll pitch round 360º is OK. My research, and experience, would suggest that there isn’t a market out there, at this time, which would be financially viable for anybody to produce such a machine and engine. Pilots who want to take up serious sport aerobatics are seldom homebuilders.

Airframe development can only ever follow engine availability – the design and development of the Acro Aerobatic Engine took place over 28 years ago and many of the fuel injection components are now uneconomical to produce in small quantities. Single-seat aerobatics is a minority sport and, in the case of affordable aerobatics, virtually non-existent. Some years ago, I tested the market with a limited production run of the Acro Aerobatic Engine which confirmed the lack of a viable market. The history of aviation is littered with failed manufacturers with good products but who didn’t get their market research right!

There are so many reasons why development of affordable competition class aerobatics hasn’t happened. When I think that it’s 27 years since I competition proved the Acro Aerobatic Engine and over 15 years since the Acro Advanced first flew – and still nothing like it in the whole world it only confirms that there isn’t a viable market to produce one – YET!

In the meantime, in retirement, my practical interest and enthusiasm continues in design, development and of course aerobatics. I’m now spending more time working on these things and when that is done I intend to publish full details of all my years of research and development. Part of this programme is the completion of a 2nd Acro Advanced and an Acro Aerobatic Engine with full electronic engine management - which would be more production and cost friendly to reproduce.

Anyone who calls in to visit me at Yearby is always welcome to have a look at the AA and if it’s a nice day I’m always happy to find the time for an aerobatic display practise session!

Sorry I haven’t a better answer right now – it gives me no pleasure having to pass on this largely negative message but I’m optimistic for the future as fuel costs rise across the world.

Best wishes and have fun. Barry

Bob Grimstead
Unregistered

Posted Friday, January 29, 2010 @ 10:43 AM  

and here is my reply to Barry...

Hello again Barry,

It is great to hear from you again after all this time.

Like you, I know that merely being able to lubricate your engine when it flies upside-down is not enough, and I very well remember your PopFly article(s?) about your Acro motor and the all-attitudes dynamometer you first had to design and develop.

With all this in mind, plus the knowledge that I have neither the time nor the skills to do the same sort of thing, I thought laterally and added molybdenum disulphide to my oil instead.
Of course, being the kind of guy I am, I didn’t do this without a lot of research. Among others, I approached you and a friend who at that time worked in the fuels research department of BP. I got him to talk with the lubricants guys, and got back the telling reply… ‘There’s no point in adding MolySlip to your oil unless you’re intending running the sump dry. It’s expensive and pointless.’

However, since what I was intending to do was precisely like running the sump dry, and since I remembered the old Motor Show MolySlip demonstrations of a Morris 1000 having its oil all drained and then the motor kept running, I tried it.

That was six years ago. At that time, my Australian Fournier’s Rectimo engine was only 1200cc and nearly forty years old, with 1,006 hours on the clock and no sign of overhaul in either the logbooks or on the motor itself. It still has round rocker-shaft pillars and 1:1 rockers in its single-port heads, plus the original Rectimo data plate riveted to the 31 VW 000.101.101A single oil pressure relief valve crankcase so you know what I’m talking about, but I did increase the bore with second-hand 83mm cylinders and pistons to make it 1400cc four years ago.

I have just gone back through my log-books and maintenance releases and established that, since then, I have flown a total of 310 hours in it, of which 260 hours and 460 sorties have all been increasingly full-on +6/-3g aerobatics (well, as full-on as one can fly in an RF4). This includes lots of upward and downward quarter vertical rolls, plus a few 180-degree half vertical rolls.

I know it’s cheating, and not making a proper engineering job of it, but actually the MolySlip works for me, and there is still no sign of wear in the engine, nor of any performance loss. I religiously time the climb to aeros height every time I fly, and always make 600 feet of climb (from 300 to 900 agl) at aerobatic weight (depending on temperature, thermals etc, of course).

I have now flown around 100 hours and more than 100 aerobatic sorties in my English RF4 as well, with its engine (rebuilt by you many years ago) similarly treated with MolySlip. Again, there has been no sign of premature wear.

I have also adapted their carburetors in the past couple of years so that the engines will continue running for a few seconds of negative G – enough for me to round out a loop, make a Derry turn or fly a four-point roll without the engine stopping. Indeed, I can now fly a rolling circle in my British Fournier without the engine stopping. The Aussie one’s carb is playing up, so it cuts out a bit. See my YouTube clip at: [url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vV0wJhEq8go[url/]

I can also lurch around a full 360-degree negative G rotation, although you cannot call it a proper outside loop. See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M53Bhowf_cg
There’s a 180-degree downward vertical roll at the end of that!

For the spectators’ view, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BnTPTKgipxI

Thank you for all your information and advice over the years, and I would love to meet up with you and see you fly your Acro Advanced. If I can persuade the organisers of the Sunderland or Windermere displays to use me again, maybe I can pop over to Redcar and meet up afterwards?

Happy flying Barry, and may your skies continue to be blue whenever possible.

Yours, Bob

Post New Topic   Post A Reply Jump to:
Contact Us | cfiamerica.com | Privacy Policy All times are GMT -4 Hours.
Welcome to The Fournier Forum, Guest!  
Login
Username :
Password :
In order to fully utilize the abilities of this board, you are required to register as a member. Registration is free, and allows you to do lots of things including turning on or off certain features of this board. Register now!
Forum Rules & Description
Who Can Read The Forum? Any registered user or guest
Who Can Post New Topics? Any administrator or moderator
Who Can Post Replies? Any administrator or moderator
Who Can Edit Posts? Any original author
Discussions on all engine related matters
Currently Active Users: 119
There are currently 0 members and 119 guests on the boards. | Most users ever online was 42535 on 04-07-2026 02:43 AM
Search This Forum
Search Keywords: Search From:
Powered by CuteCast v2.0 BETA 2
Copyright © 2001-2003 ArtsCore Studios